“ With regard to § 106.45(b)(3)(i), which calls for mandatory
dismissal in specific situations, the Department has revised this provision to
clarify that these a dismissal does not preclude action underneath a non-Title IX provision of the recipient's code of carry out.
For comparable clarity we have revised § 106.44(d) to refer to subpart D of 34 CFR portion 106
relatively than exclusively to § 106.44. With respect to a necessary dismissal beneath §
106.45(b)(3)(i), the Department has revised this provision to explain that such a dismissal is only
for Title IX uses and does not preclude action beneath one
more provision of the recipient's code of perform. Changes: The
Department revises § 106.6(f) to state that nothing at all in 34 CFR section 106 may well be browse in derogation of any individual's
rights under Title VII. Some commenters expressed confusion about the
applicability of the proposed grievance method provisions (especially,
§ 106.45) to staff members and asked the Department to explain the scope of the
grievance method requirements with respect to workforce.
Comments: Another commenter urged the Department to explicitly involve that all of a recipient's workforce be informed
of the quite possibly felony character of worker-on-college student sexual
misconduct under State rules and to comply with State
necessary reporting necessities. ”